On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Jonathan Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Much obliged. As a case of interopability, maybe something like: entities > MUST NOT send byte order marks, however, they MUST tolerate them. > > I am sure there are one or two (possible no longer maintained) libraries out > there that ignorantly write them out. 2 years ago agsxmpp did (qualified with > a quick paroosal, so don't quote me on that) so I wouldn't be surprised at > all if some others did. > > A little OT, is there any list of specific ammendments to 3920, I am pretty > familiar with 3920 so I might miss some of the changes/clarifications.
The latest draft: http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc3920bis-08.html Differences From RFC 3920: http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc3920bis-08.html#diffs XSF Source Control: http://xmpp.org/xsf/sourcecontrol.shtml > > Sorry for not conforming to the list standards, I am on my phone. > > -----Original Message----- ---snip--- -- Waqas Hussain _______________________________________________ JDev mailing list FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________
