Dnia 2009-12-17, czw o godzinie 16:58 +0100, Simon Josefsson pisze: > Sure, but caching the hashed values scales better. Remember, we are > not > talking about just one hash call, typically there is 4096 hash > iterations when deriving the keys from a password in SCRAM.
Oh. So you really meant that this is a costly operation, not that it does not scale. _______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
