On 2/16/10 11:14 AM, Ilya Braude wrote: > > Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> On 2/13/10 7:03 AM, Tuomas Koski wrote: >>> On 10 February 2010 22:44, Ilya Braude <i...@drakontas.com> wrote: >>> >>> In the end we would have something like this, right? : >>> >>> <geoloc xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/geoloc' xml:lang='en'> >>> <source>GPS</source> >>> <lat>45.44</lat> >>> <lon>12.33</lon> >>> </geoloc> >>> <geoloc xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/geoloc' xml:lang='en'> >>> <source>Open Street Map</source> >>> <text>Marcon, Venezia, Veneto, Italy</text> >>> <country>Italy</country> >>> </geoloc> >>> >> >> Do we have two things here, a source type (e.g., GPS) and the name of >> the provider? >> > > That's a good point. For example if a user is using geode to generate > lat/lon based on visible wifi access points, we could have something like: > > <geoloc xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/geoloc' xml:lang='en'> > <source>wifi</source> > <provider>geode</provider> > ... > </geoloc> > > > Otherwise, placing 'geode' in the source element would mask the actual > location source. > > Same thing for other providers like Fire Eagle, etc.
That's how it seems to me. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org _______________________________________________
