First post to the list - hi everyone!

We develop the 'community' area of an online gaming site - basically using MUC 
with 20+ rooms ranging from almost empty to sometimes up to 500 odd occupants. 
The 'chat hosts' in these rooms are people with the moderator role. Where 
possible we follow the protocols rather than implement our own.

I need to return a packet to the end user that contains a brief summary of the 
rooms, consisting of basic room information (name, description) plus room 
occupancy and which moderators are currently in the room. I'm stumped for her 
to do this, as no XEP seems to fit the bill:

Basic Service Discovery (0030) - In order to retrieve full information about an 
entity and its associated items, the requesting application needs to "walk the 
tree" of items. Naturally, this can result in a large number of requests and 
responses. The requesting application SHOULD NOT send follow-up requests to all 
items associated with an entity if the list of such items is long (e.g., more 
than twenty items).
Problem - There will likely be more than 20 rooms to query individually.

Extended Service Discovery (0128) - An entity MUST NOT supply extended 
information about associated children communicated via the 
'http://jabber.org/protocol/disco#items' namespace, since a core principle of 
Service Discovery is that an entity must define its own identity only and must 
not define the identity of any children associated with the entity. 
Problem - As the entity being queried here (I imagine) is the MUC service 
itself, am I breaking protocol by asking for a lot of information about it's 
children?

Jabber search doesn't seem quite right as it doesn't feel like a search - I 
always query for the same information so service discovery seems the natural 
fit.

Any help would be greatly appreciated : )

Michael 

_______________________________________________
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to