-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/5/12 2:47 PM, Daniel Dormont wrote: > Reading through RFC 6121 more thoroughly, I now see that section > 8.5.1 summarizes exactly what the server is supposed to do: > http://xmpp.org/rfcs/rfc6121.html#rules-localpart-nosuchuser > > I guess my question is why. If a server is allowed to (and > ejabberd does) send a service-unavailable response for messages > where the user is not found, why can't it do that for presence > subscriptions?
Good question. Right now I see no immediate harm in allowing service-unavailable in those situations, and we might decide to make such a change if we work on 6121bis, but personally I need to think about it further when I'm not in the middle of an IETF meeting. /psa -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlCYLBIACgkQNL8k5A2w/vygDACg2OqidE4Z71rO77ihfkH1uo25 vf4AoKFQEpZc0bgsL3HyyTRKk5BaUGKP =ThN4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
