Why not metacontacts here?

Stefan de Konink <ste...@konink.de> wrote:

>Currently a lot of transports are available which provide a subdomain
>and a new XMPP "compatible" jid which is build out of
>old_protocol_uri@transport_subdomain.
>
>In clients such as Pidgin it is possible to group contacts which have
>the same physical identy. Similar to the resource system in XMPP, Pidgin
>offers to fallback on a different technology if the user becomes
>unavailable on either of the grouped accounts.
>
>Given that this fallback is what we actually want to see happening I
>wonder if any thought has been given on "automatic accountgrouping" or
>registering a different account as a specific resource of a user. The
>latter is currently - to my knowledge - not able to be achieved using
>current XEPs other than having a specific transport 'call in' as Jabber
>client opposed to being component. Other solutions like proprietary
>extensions fake client connectivity.
>
>
>I would like to hear some thoughts on the goal of registering
>transparent accounts, independent of technology. For example:
>user@domain/pidgin, user@domain/msn, user@domain/sip.
>
>
>Stefan
>_______________________________________________
>JDev mailing list
>Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
>Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org
>_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
JDev mailing list
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to