Why not metacontacts here? Stefan de Konink <ste...@konink.de> wrote:
>Currently a lot of transports are available which provide a subdomain >and a new XMPP "compatible" jid which is build out of >old_protocol_uri@transport_subdomain. > >In clients such as Pidgin it is possible to group contacts which have >the same physical identy. Similar to the resource system in XMPP, Pidgin >offers to fallback on a different technology if the user becomes >unavailable on either of the grouped accounts. > >Given that this fallback is what we actually want to see happening I >wonder if any thought has been given on "automatic accountgrouping" or >registering a different account as a specific resource of a user. The >latter is currently - to my knowledge - not able to be achieved using >current XEPs other than having a specific transport 'call in' as Jabber >client opposed to being component. Other solutions like proprietary >extensions fake client connectivity. > > >I would like to hear some thoughts on the goal of registering >transparent accounts, independent of technology. For example: >user@domain/pidgin, user@domain/msn, user@domain/sip. > > >Stefan >_______________________________________________ >JDev mailing list >Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev >Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org >_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org _______________________________________________