On 10/30/2013 1:23 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/30/13 12:07 PM, Jesse Thompson wrote:
On 10/30/2013 11:25 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
IMHO we could use POSH in the shorter term and DANE in the longer
term.
Does/will the IM Observatory/XMPPoke display POSH information?
Not yet.
OK, probably just waiting for a volunteer. Maybe I'll take a look at
the XMPPoke codebase in my free time.
It would also be nice to show server dialback info, but that might be
more difficult to query.
As a community, we need to figure out the path forward for things like
POSH and DANE. I think DANE/DNSSEC will be awesome eventually, but I
think POSH is deployable in the shorter term. So IMHO we need both.
Yes, I agree. That reminds me that I should nag our network engineers
about DNSSEC again. :-) POSH seems relatively easy for operators to
publish; assuming the servers build support querying it.
Jesse
_______________________________________________
JDev mailing list
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________