>From: "Scot Mcphee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "JDJList" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "JDJList" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [jdjlist] Re: J2EE, Tomcat, JBoss, etc. >Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 09:24:11 +1000 > > > > This is really where JBoss shines; because it's VERY component-driven, >if > > you find that you dislike one product (say, the servlet > > container) and need > > to swap it out... do so! > >Yeah it's kinda nice, but i'm development focussed more than admin so such >matters don't concern me that much. ;)
Me too... but the fact that I'm not limited to a broken implementation of something makes development easier, too. > > "swap." (Ob. > > WebSphere derogatory comment: "WebSphere put the 'ick' in > > 'slick.'") (Same > >I'll just stick up for websphere a bit here. The last job I had, where we >were devloping a J2EE/XML scheduling engine, we used Websphere as our main >dev/testing platform and actually I quite liked it. Management didn't like >the price much though. I've used WAS myself, although an older version; it's hopefully improved a fair amount. At the time, though, IBM's retarded marketers made me resent the product, and VAJ was even harder to work with than Eclipse is now (sorry, couldn't resist: I like Eclipse if I don't have notepad or IDEA to work with), and WAS's stupid licensing for development did nothing to help. True fact: one of the most ardent supporters of WAS at that site said, in WAS's defense: "It's not THAT bad..." ----------------------------------------------- Joseph B. Ottinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com To change your JDJList options, please visit: http://www.sys-con.com/java/list.cfm
