Blair Wyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Wednesday, 01/22/2003 at 02:03 CST, "Roger Glover" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A java.lang.Class instance can represent the *METATYPE* for any > > Java type except the null type. > > Closest thing might be 'void.class' eh? True enough. In fact, it seems to me that you could make either keyword "null" or "void" do double duty as both the non-existant reference and the non-existant return type, and eliminate the other keyword from the language altogether. But there I go, redesigning the language again... -- Roger Glover [EMAIL PROTECTED] ____________________________________________________ To change your JDJList options, please visit: http://www.sys-con.com/java/list.cfm Be respectful! Clean up your posts before replying ____________________________________________________
