|
Well,
yes, Daivd you're right but I wanted to simplify it down to a
dichotomy between things of type Object and things that are primitive
types. So that's why I chose to use "String" = {'S', 't', 'r', 'i', 'n',
'g'} because ultimately underlying it somewhere that's what is happening.
Otherwise we get into this business of the compiler behaviour in terms of
implicit constructors "String" is translated to new String("String")
which looks recursive (Damn) to me, so I just wanted to head all that
explanation off and go straight to the jugular of the char[]. And prevent
further loading of the air conditioning. ;-)
regs
scot.
--- You are currently subscribed to jdjlist as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
- [jdjlist] RE: String and other classes Blair Wyman
- [jdjlist] RE: String and other classes Scot Mcphee
- [jdjlist] RE: String and other classes Blair Wyman
- [jdjlist] RE: String and other classes abhay
