On 9/5/11 10:14 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote: > On 18:58 Sat 03 Sep , David Holmes wrote: >> Most fixes to 7u must go to 8 first. I assume at least part of the reason >> for this is to have fixes "bake" in 8 before coming down into 7u. But I'm >> seeing a lot of pushes to 8 followed (sometimes within minutes) by requests >> to push to 7u. I know there are various schedules to adhere to but it seems >> to me that the requirement to push to 8 before 7u is not serving any purpose >> in these cases. >> >> David >> > > I agree. With 7-->6, we used to only backport if the change had been in a > number > of build drops. However, there don't seem to be OpenJDK8 build drops yet; or > have > I missed something?
No 8 build drops yet, afaik. cheers, dalibor topic -- Oracle <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador Phone: +494023646738 <tel:+494023646738> | Mobile: +491772664192 <tel:+491772664192> Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603 Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Kunz, Marcel van de Molen, Alexander van der Ven Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment
