I agree. Be a good idea to ask for review from all the affected teams.
I _think_ core libs is the only one we missed, though.
Paul
On 12/1/11 8:07 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/12/2011 7:38 AM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
On 12/1/11 6:12 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
Kelly,
Yes, that is correct. This push is initially just for jdk7u-osx, which
is a development forest. I'm not sure exactly what the procedure
will be yet
for the push into jdk7u-dev.
There is no special procedure for pushing into jdk7u-osx that's
different from
the one for jdk7u-dev. You need to submit a bulk change request for
approval first,
someone (i.e. either me or Edvard) needs to approve it, then the push
can happen
- regardless whether that's jdk7u-dev or jdk7u-osx.
All the osx porting work is being discussed on the macosx-port-dev
mailing list. Most core-libs subscribers will not be on that list
(including me - which means my cc to that list will either bounce or
get held up). There are proposed changes to core Java classes that
should be explicitly reviewed and approved by the core-libs folk in my
opinion.
David
