> Frankly, an Open Source project is not run by it's users - it's run by it's 
> developers. If no developers come forward to actively support 32-bit, then 
> the only possible outcome is for it to be dropped. If this is unacceptable to 
> the users, they may choose to become developers and either contribute their 
> expertise, or fork the project.

OpenSource project destination is not developers but users.
Developers didn't code to please themselves but to provide a value and
products to end users.

And when you users are also Developers, Java developers, you could be
confident they know what they want

> Apple provide a 32/64 Universal implementation, but Oracle has only committed 
> to shipping a 64-bit only implementation for their proprietary product. The 
> OpenJDK product should be build-able for 32 or 32/64 Universal by anyone 
> else, and should accept contributions to it's maintenance, but if nobody is 
> signing up to keep forward-porting the changes - they don't have a future.

All platforms supported by Oracle for Java 7 have both 32 and 64 JVM except OSX.
There was a miss for OSX users community between Apple to Oracle
transition., 32/64 bits support was available, they lost it, too bad.

> Am I missing something here?

Nothing, this question about 32/64 bits has been raised longtime ago,
at time where OpenJDK 7 for OSX moved from macosx-port to jdk7u.
I spend some time to see how to bring universal 32/64 bits support
back, there is no interest here, end of game.

I won't comment anymore this thread, I already asked Dalibor to drop
my OCA and wait how I should resign officially from OpenJDK project.

Cheers and long life OSS

Reply via email to