On 8/29/12 1:56 PM, Henri Gomez wrote: > Shouldn't it be general case for OpenJDK on Linux to use dynamic > linking with stdc++ like all others libs ?
For 7 updates? Probably not. See http://markmail.org/message/yqexkr4ty7s4gelz for details. As Kelly said then "It is quite possible that we don't need to static link anything anymore, but that would need to be verified." Not worth the bother from my POV, as it's a) not a bug - it's the intended behavior, b) those who desire not to statically link with libsdtc++ can do so easily, c) it would have to be done and verified on 8 first, and d) 8 is getting a new build system anyway So, in short, there is not much of a point in changing it here now. cheers, dalibor topic -- Oracle <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961 <tel:+491737185961> Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603 Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Kunz Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment
