Now pushed to jdk7u-dev [1]. Regards, Neil
[1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/c8b54d94561a On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 18:12 +0100, Seán Coffey wrote: > Approved for jdk7u-dev. Note that this most likely means the fix will > end up in 7u12. If there's a strong justification for 7u10 inclusion, > let me know and one of the jdk7u maintainers can help you work through a > phase2 request[1] for 7u10. > > I'll create a bug record to track this fix in jdk7u. > > Regards, > Sean. > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/phase2/phase2-process.html > > On 17/09/2012 02:55, Sean Chou wrote: > > Hi Pavel, > > > > I applied the patch from jdk8 to jdk7u-dev, it is built, passes the test in > > bug report as well as the jtreg test. No modification is needed, so I > > didn't made a new webrev. > > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Pavel Porvatov > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> Hi Sean, > >> > >> Do you have webrev for jdk7? Did you applied it and did the test passed? > >> > >> Regards, Pavel > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Here's a request for porting fix 7049024 back to JDK7, could you please > >>> help to review? > >>> > >>> Bug: > >>> http://bugs.sun.com/**bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_**id=7049024<http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7049024> > >>> > >>> Change set: > >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/**jdk8/awt/jdk/rev/323f6d046cc9<http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/jdk/rev/323f6d046cc9> > >>> > >>> Thread where it was reviewed: > >>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/**pipermail/swing-dev/2011-** > >>> September/001725.html<http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2011-September/001725.html> > >>> _ > >>> _ > >>> _ > >>> > >>> _ > >>> -- > >>> Best Regards, > >>> Sean Chou > >>> > >>> > > > -- Unless stated above: IBM email: neil_richards at uk.ibm.com IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
