Now pushed to jdk7u-dev/jdk [1]. Regards, Neil
[1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/d5803c262114 On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 20:54 +0000, Seán Coffey wrote: > Doesn't look like Alan has a problem with this being backported to > jdk7u-dev. > > Approved. > > regards, > Sean. > > On 09/11/2012 06:20, jayashree viswanathan wrote: > > On 07-11-2012 5:45 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: > >> On 07/11/2012 12:05, jayashree viswanathan wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Alan , > >>> > >>> Thanks for your quick response . We are having the problem in JDK7U > >>> as well . Do you mean that 7192849 was already fixed in JDK7U ? > >>> > >> It depends on which problem you are running into. The main issue in > >> 7192849 has been addressed by 6346658 in both jdk8 and 7u6. This was > >> confirmed by Shirish Kuncolienkar in the review thread. Once that was > >> established we used 7192849 for the secondary issue that was > >> mentioned in the bug report. > >> > >> -Alan > > Hi Alan , > > > > The problem we are able to see is still the scenario where you get a > > valid SelectionKey even though the channel is closed , well the > > secondary issues and not the bug related to 6346658. > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > Jayashree Viswanathan > -- Unless stated above: IBM email: neil_richards at uk.ibm.com IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
