Thanks for the confirmation Sherman.
Frank - consider this approved for jdk7u-dev then.
regards,
Sean.
On 30/01/2013 05:44, Xueming Shen wrote:
Hi Sean, I'm fine for the backport. As suggested in the bug report,
even this
is an "in-compatible" change by nature, but those code points/mappings
have
been changed by the standard (gb) and the main vendor (ms) for so many
years, I don't think it's going to be an issue even we change it in 7u.
My apology for taking so long.
-Sherman
On 01/29/2013 01:50 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
Good point Frank. This one seems to have dropped off the radar.
cc'ing Sherman here. I know he's busy with JSR 310 work at the moment
also.
regards,
Sean.
On 29/01/2013 07:29, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi Sean,
Has Sherman got any idea of it?
Best regards,
Frank
Ok - let's hold off on this one until we get Sherman's thoughts on
this.
Regards,
Sean.
On 14/09/2012 10:43, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> Edvard/Sean - would it be possible to hold off approving this one
> until you hear from Sherman Shen on this one? Sherman is the
original
> author of these changes. I was the reviewer for this change but I
have
> concerns about changing these mappings in an update release (but
> Sherman is the expert in this area and will have a better feel
for the
> impact of such a change).
>
> -Alan
>
>
> On 14/09/2012 09:16, Shi Jun Zhang wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to request for approval to push the following change
into 7u10.
>>
>> Changeset in jdk8
>>http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/d1f52390275b
>>
>> Webrev
>>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zhangshj/jdk7u/6183404/webrev.00/
>>
>> Reviewed by alanb
>>
>> Review thread
>>http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2012-May/000630.html
>>
>
