Re: tck test status

[Craig Russell]

Hi Andy,

On May 26, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote:

What is this relationship causing the issue ? I'm guessing a Map in Person of <String, String>. It is a perfectly valid thing for an impl to want to put a PK on any table. It is also a valid thing for an impl to add additional columns where required to allow duplicates etc. Depends on the exact nature

of this relation in question. This page
http://www.jpox.org/docs/1_1/relationships_1_N_map.html

being added in this particular situation.



other end of the M-N as you had before.

shows what JPOX currently does for Maps. If you can identify which one you have, then maybe Erik or I can remember why there is an ADPT_PK_IDX column PS. Next nightly build (20050527) will *not* need the use of <join> on both ends of a M-N, so you can have a "mapped-by" on one end and <join> on the

Craig

Thanks for this. It's great that you guys are so responsive to the TCK team's requests.

--
Andy
JPOX - Java Persistent Objects

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature