Hi Michael, On Jun 1, 2005, at 9:30 AM, Michael Watzek wrote:
Hi Craig,No. My question is: Do we want to *force* test cases to leave the PMF open when they add tear down instances and/or classes?I think so. Since this is a new feature, any test case that uses tearDown methods should leave the PMF open. Can you think of a case where this is not true?And we should probably disallow pmf == null in cases where there is work to do.I'm not sure. Do you mean that the test result is ERROR for test cases having "pmf == null in cases where there is work to do"? Let me know if you feel strong on this.
Yes. Unless we can think of cases where the test method wants instances removed but needs to close the PMF for some reason. I think in these cases we can let the test method clean itself.
Craig
Regards, Michael
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
