Re: Removed DetachOnClose property is still present in spec

[Craig Russell]

Hi Matthew, Yes, this is one of three places that DetachOnClose still exists in the PFD.  Please see my message of 23-Sep 7:26 AM PDT. I've already updated my working draft but it's not public yet. But please consider it gone ^ 3. Thanks, Craig On Sep 23, 2005, at 11:59 AM, Matthew T. Adams wrote: I think that section 5.5.4 of the PFD needs to be updated to reflect that the property DetachOnClose is gone.  It currently reads: <spec> A hollow instance transitions to detached if its persistence manager is closed while the DetachOnClose property is true. </spec> This is not possible since there is no property DetachOnClose. --matthew Matthew T. Adams Corporate Technical Advisor & Senior Consultant Mobile:  +1 253 732 1051 Phone:  +1 206 331 3833 Fax:  +1 815 331 0952 [EMAIL PROTECTED] P.O. Box 24163 Federal Way, WA  98093 www.xcalia.com Xcalia makes implementing SOA easy with agile business intermediation software that combines heterogeneous data with services to easily develop and deploy transactional composite applications.  Enterprises can quickly respond to changing business requirements and dramatically reduce the costs of data access and service integration. Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature