[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-188?page=all ]

Craig Russell updated JDO-188:
------------------------------

    Attachment: jdo-188.patch

This patch includes comments from Michael (thanks, I missed the cleanup of the 
second PM), an update to the alltests.conf, and a slightly different 
implementation of JDOHelper.getObjectIds(Object[ ]).

I plan to check it in tomorrow.


> Add tests for static JDOHelper.getObjectIds methods
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: JDO-188
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-188
>      Project: JDO
>         Type: Test
>   Components: tck20
>  Environment: TCK
>     Reporter: Craig Russell
>     Assignee: Craig Russell
>  Attachments: jdo-188.patch, jdo-188.patch
>
> A8.3-11 [static Object[] getObjectIds (Object[] pcs); static Collection 
> getObjectIds (Collection pcs); These methods return the JDO identities of the 
> parameter instances. For each instance in the parameter, the getObjectId 
> method is called. They return one identity instance for each 
> persistence-capable instance in the parameter. The order of iteration of the 
> returned Collection exactly matches the order of iteration of the parameter 
> Collection].
> The test case api.persistencemanager.GetObjectIds needs a test method per 
> API. 
> The setUp method creates 50 persistent instances of type PCPoint and stores 
> the ids in an ArrayList and the instances in a separate ArrayList. The test 
> case call getObjectIds and verify that the object ids returned match the 
> objects ids that are in the list.
> There are no negative tests.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to