Hi Andy,
I thought about it and think that the changed query does not add much
value. I removed the second query from the test and checked in the
changed (see r330775).
However, I think the class misses to test the order of implicit
parameters used in different query elements. E.g. a query might use an
implicit parameter in the filter and another implicit parameter in the
having clause. I discussed this with Michael W. and he will add some
more test queries.
Regards Michael
Hi Andy,
good catch! The second filter should be "lastname == :param1 &&
firstname == :param2". Then it returns an empty result as expected. I'll
change this soon.
Regards Michael
The TCK test OrderOfParameters has an error currently.
The second query has "firstname == :param2 & lastname == :param1" (the
opposite
way around to the params in the first query), and thye parameter
values for both
queries are the same. As a result the result will be the same (the
parameters are
assigned to the values in the order they are encountered in the test).
You should
swap the values around if you want to get the expected result AFAIK.
--
Andy
--
Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tech.spree.de/
Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66
Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin
