It seems to work.
Loader 1 javax.jdo.spi.StateManager is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Loader 2 javax.jdo.spi.StateManager is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
javax.jdo.spi.StateManager in use is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Loader 1 javax.jdo.spi.StateManager is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Loader 2 javax.jdo.spi.StateManager is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
javax.jdo.spi.StateManager in use is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is the unit test I'm running
File root = new
File(ClassLoaderTest.class.getResource("/org/jpox/persistence/ClassLoaderTest.class").getPath()).getParentFile().getParentFile().getParentFile().getParentFile();
URL path1 = new URL(root.toURL().toString()+"/");
URL path2 = new URL(path1.toString()+"/test/");
URL path3 = new URL(path1.toString()+"/test-classes/");
String jar =
JDOHelper.class.getResource("/javax/jdo/JDOHelper.class").getPath();
if( jar.indexOf('!')>0 ) // jar
{
jar = jar.substring(0,jar.indexOf('!'));
}
else
{
jar = new
File(jar).getParentFile().getParentFile().getParentFile().toURL().toString();
}
URL path4 = new URL(jar);
URLClassLoader loader = new URLClassLoader(new URL[] {path1, path2,
path3, path4},null);
ClassLoader l = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader();
Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(loader);
PersistenceManager pm = pmf.getPersistenceManager();
Transaction tx = pm.currentTransaction();
Object id = null;
try
{
l.loadClass("javax.jdo.spi.StateManager").forName("javax.jdo.spi.StateManager",true,l);
loader.loadClass("javax.jdo.spi.StateManager").forName("javax.jdo.spi.StateManager",true,loader);
System.out.println("Loader 1 javax.jdo.spi.StateManager is
"+l.loadClass("javax.jdo.spi.StateManager").getClassLoader());
System.out.println("Loader 2 javax.jdo.spi.StateManager is
"+loader.loadClass("javax.jdo.spi.StateManager").getClassLoader());
Person p = new Person(987322,"cl","last","mail");
tx.begin();
pm.makePersistent(p);
id = pm.getObjectId(p);
System.out.println("javax.jdo.spi.StateManager in use is
"+((org.jpox.PersistenceManagerImpl)pm).getStateManagerById(id).getClass().getClassLoader());
tx.commit();
}
finally
{
if (tx.isActive())
{
tx.rollback();
}
pm.close();
}
pm = pmf.getPersistenceManager();
Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(l);
tx = pm.currentTransaction();
try
{
tx.begin();
Person p = (Person) pm.getObjectById(id);
l.loadClass("javax.jdo.spi.StateManager").forName("javax.jdo.spi.StateManager");
loader.loadClass("javax.jdo.spi.StateManager").forName("javax.jdo.spi.StateManager");
System.out.println("Loader 1 javax.jdo.spi.StateManager is
"+l.loadClass("javax.jdo.spi.StateManager").getClassLoader());
System.out.println("Loader 2 javax.jdo.spi.StateManager is
"+loader.loadClass("javax.jdo.spi.StateManager").getClassLoader());
System.out.println("javax.jdo.spi.StateManager in use is
"+((org.jpox.PersistenceManagerImpl)pm).getStateManagerById(id).getClass().getClassLoader());
assertEquals("cl",p.getFirstName());
pm.deletePersistent(p);
tx.commit();
}
finally
{
if (tx.isActive())
{
tx.rollback();
}
Quoting Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Erik,
>
> If your Employee is loaded by classloader 1 and your implementation
> is loaded by classloader 2 then the implementation won't work using
> the standard JDO 2 binary compatible contracts.
>
> Your implementation implements cl2.StateManager but the Employee
> expects cl1.StateManager. I don't see how it can work.
>
> Craig
>
> On Jan 11, 2006, at 1:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Craig,
> >
> > We can make it work easily. We are able to verify by class name the
> > interfaces
> > implemented, but I wonder if there is some security restriction on
> > that.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Erik Bengtson
> >
> > Quoting Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> Hi Erik,
> >>
> >> No, this is not ok.
> >>
> >> The problem is for example when the application calls
> >> pm.makePersistent(employee). If the jdoimpl does a check (if (! o
> >> instanceof PersistenceCapable) throw JDOUserException("Object was not
> >> enhanced");) then the different classes will be an issue. The
> >> PersistenceCapable in the 2nd jar is not the same class as in the 1st
> >> jar even though they have the same name.
> >>
> >> Have you tried it?
> >>
> >> Craig
> >>
> >> On Jan 10, 2006, at 4:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> An app has two classloaders, the 1st with jdoimpl.jar+jdo2.jar and
> >>> the 2nd with
> >>> persistent classes +jdo2.jar.
> >>>
> >>> The PCclass links to jdo2.jar(2) and the jdoImpl links to jdo2.jar
> >>> (1). I guess
> >>> that's ok, right? In any case, it may worth mentioning that in the
> >>> spec.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Erik Bengtson
> >>
> >> Craig Russell
> >> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/
> >> jdo
> >> 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
