+1. Looks good!
-- Michelle
Craig L Russell wrote:
The distribution of the tck source posted on 20-Jan-2006 was flawed,
as discovered during testing of the bits from the site. The RunRules
were confused and the distribution was missing a file necessary to
test an IUT.
The rest of the distribution passed the testing and has not been changed.
I've uploaded new bits for the tck distribution to
http://people.apache.org/~clr/downloads/mirror-dist-db-jdo/2.0-beta/jdo2-tck-2.0-beta-src-24_Jan_2006.zip
<http://people.apache.org/%7Eclr/downloads/mirror-dist-db-jdo/2.0-beta/jdo2-tck-2.0-beta-src-24_Jan_2006.zip>.
The date on the file was changed.
Since the bits were changed, I'll hold the voting open until Friday
morning 27-Jan-2006. If you previously voted to release the
distribution and you agree with the new distribution, you need not do
anything. If you previously voted to release and change your mind,
please reply.
Craig
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
