Hi Erik,

On Feb 3, 2006, at 11:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

- Release plans. We plan to cut a release at the end of the month.
Everything we fix in JIRA should be marked as fixed in rc1. Michelle:
we should do some formal release testing for rc1. AI Michelle propose
a release test plan and start a wiki page.

It means we have to release JPOX too.

Yes.

IMO a release candidate means no changes
are planned before the final release unless a bug is found.

Yes.

Do you expect for
this release all tests pass with JPOX ?

Yes.

Saying it differently, is the release
dependent on JPOX results?

Yes, without all tests passing on JPOX there is no release.

Does it also mean that all unresolved spec issues will not be resolved?

I'll send out the list of unresolved spec issues and propose resolutions for all of them. There are not very many still outstanding by the way.

Craig

Regards,

Quoting Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Attendees: Michelle Caisse, Martin Zaun, Michael Bouschen, Michael
Watzek, Matthew Adams, Craig Russell

Agenda:

1. Test status (Michelle) 1154 tests, 4 failures, 2 errors.

2. Attach/detach tests (Matthew) no change. In fact Matthew will need
to attend to some personal business and won't be working on these
tests for a couple of weeks. Volunteers can take the code that's been
checked in and work on it.

3. Other issues (any and all)

- Release plans. We plan to cut a release at the end of the month.
Everything we fix in JIRA should be marked as fixed in rc1. Michelle:
we should do some formal release testing for rc1. AI Michelle propose
a release test plan and start a wiki page.

- Martin checked into the NoClassDefFoundError thrown during
Class.forName. The result is that JDO implementations should catch
not only ClassNotFoundException but in general LinkageError. Any of
these Throwables should mean that the class does not exist. This
issue came up during resolution of a name in a JDOQL query. The JDO
implementation should use "class does not exist" to indicate that the
name is not a class. JDO-194 has all the details. AI Craig: update
the bug report and add a new test method for this condition.

- JDO-246 variable in the query result. AI Craig: update the issue.

- JDO is in the "incubator" category in JIRA. It should be in the
"db" category. AI Craig: send a message to infrastructure to fix this.

Action Items from weeks past:

[Jan 20 2005] Debugging the regression we notice that some of the
foreign keys in the Company model have generated names which makes it
difficult to resolve the source of a key constraint violation.
Schema0 through schema4 are affected. AI: Michelle to fix the schema.
Done.

[Feb 3 2006] AI Michael W fix list of teardown classes in company
model reader. JDO-285. But this fix cannot be checked in until JPOX
is fixed.

[Jan 20 2005]  AI Craig look at new life cycle tests to see if it can
fail at the end printing failure messages. AI Craig review the spec
updates to make sure the test is consistent. AI Craig: resolve the
test case and spec issues.

[Jan 20 2005]   AI Michelle update the JDO releases page to point to
mirrors for download. AI Craig check in the released beta artifacts
to the JDO maven repository (create a new releases directory parallel
to trunk and branches).

[Jan 13 2005] AI Martin look at the enhancement tests for
completeness (JDO-64).

[Jan 6 2005] AI: Michael: need to add a public static final field in
a public class to test fully qualified class name static field in query.

[Dec 23 2005] Query tests (Michael B) Looking at JDO-194 errors on
Windows that don't happen on Linux. Might be a JRE bug. AI Martin
file a Java bug so we know that there is a Java issue.

[Dec 23 2005] Fetch depth discussion: The spec needs more information
than is there in the PFD. AI Craig get more jdo experts involved in
the discussion. In progress.

[Dec 9 2005]: Nontransactional write semantics appear to differ
between optimistic and datastore transactions. Is this intentional?
AI: Craig discuss with expert group. Done. It is intentional.
[Dec 2 2005] Inheritance 3 fails. Optimization of inheritance 1 where
there is no  table for abstract classes. JPOX doesn't support it. AI
Craig:  discuss this mapping with expert group. It might be an
optional feature.

[Nov 18 2005] AI: BEA to sign the donation paperwork for their test
suite. Review how to merge their test cases into JDO TCK.

[Nov 4 2005] AI Martin: Update Martin's wiki with discusion of JDK
1.5 issues. in progress

[Oct 14 2005] AI: Michelle distill the mapping support that JPOX has
into a list of features that are/are not supported.

[Sep 2 2005] AI: To recruit members, update the web site. Articles
on  TheServerSide directing attention to the site. T-shirts, logo.
AI:  Craig write a ServerSide article.

[July 29 2005] AI: Michelle Chapter 18 wiki needs to be updated to
include all JDO metadata elements and attributes. [not done]

April 15 2005] AI: Brian Topping will do the maven goal for creating
and uploading the snapshots. He will create a directory parallel to
trunk called "releases" and put the snapshots there.

[May 13 2005] AI: Brian Topping will arrange for automated nightly
builds.

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/ jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!






Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to