> What do you think?
Excellent.
Quoting Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Erik,
>
> You are right on both.
>
> Employees 1, 2, and 3 all work on orange, so there should be three
> result tuples in both cases.
>
> I think we might want to make two test cases out of each of these,
> making four tests in total, and remove duplicates in two of the cases
> by using the distinct keyword, as in
>
> > /*RESULT*/ "distinct p.projid, p.name",
>
> > /*RESULT*/ "distinct p",
>
> What do you think?
>
> Craig
>
> On Feb 11, 2006, at 3:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Some expected results need to be reviewed
> >
> > 1) testNavigation(org.apache.jdo.tck.query.result.VariableInResult)
> >
> > expected: [[1, orange]]
> > got: [[1, orange], [1, orange], [1, orange]]
> >
> > /*UNIQUE*/ null,
> > /*RESULT*/ "p.projid, p.name",
> > /*INTO*/ null,
> > /*FROM*/ Employee.class,
> > /*EXCLUDE*/ null,
> > /*WHERE*/ "projects.contains(p) & p.name == 'orange'",
> > /*VARIABLES*/ "Project p",
> > /*PARAMETERS*/ null,
> >
> > 2) testNoNavigation(org.apache.jdo.tck.query.result.VariableInResult)
> >
> > expects {Project1}, but I think it should be {Project1, Project1,
> > Project1}
> > /*RESULT*/ "p",
> > /*INTO*/ null,
> > /*FROM*/ Employee.class,
> > /*EXCLUDE*/ null,
> > /*WHERE*/ "projects.contains(p) & p.name == 'orange'",
> > /*VARIABLES*/ "Project p",
> > /*PARAMETERS*/ null,
> >
> > Currently JPOX creates an invalid SQL for the item 2, at least in
> > my local dev
> > workspace.
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
