Hi Michael, On Feb 21, 2006, at 9:37 AM, Michael Bouschen wrote:
Hi Craig, [...]Just one comment. There is no meaning to the order of attributes, just order of elements. But there's no issue with fixing the order of the attributes either.I know the order of attributes is not important, but it helps when comparing the jdo.dtd and the orm.dtd to make sure the orm dtd accepts a subset of the jdo metatdata :-). Try 'diff jdo.dtd orm.dtd', I was surprised to see how many differences there are.Good grief. Some of these are line ending differences. :-(I could not find any ^M problems in the files. I think the diffs are because the orm.dtd lists the elements in a different order, e.g. jdo.dtd lists the element property between interface and class, where orm.dtd lists it between column and field. This does not affect the accepted XML, it just makes a comparison between the two dtds harder.
Not ^M differences, but spaces (I think). I just looked at it again and I can't account for some of the diffs at all.
But the main point is: good. Thanks for changing the files so they are as similar as possible. It will make it easier for us.
+1 We need to make sure that the corresponding changes are made to the maven definitions, but I think it's time.Other question: do we want to rename api20/src/dtd to api20/src/ schema?OK, I can work on this, but I would like to check in a first version of the schema validation test before doing this rename. I attached a new patch to JDO-202.
Cool. I just looked at your 0220 patch and I think it's time to check these files in.
Craig
Regards Michael [...] -- Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
