Re: JPOX issues

[Craig L Russell]

Hi Erik,

On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:21 PM, Erik Bengtson wrote:

Can someone with spring understanding check JDO-327 ?

Your symptom is different from mine. Have you checked in all the code that gives you the error on pm.newInstance(IDentalInsurance.class) ?

With me
JDO-241
JDO-246 (Issue in derby, needs workaround implemented in JPOX)
JDO-337 (to be fixed tonight)

Work not started
JDO-326 (abstract class support)

Regards,

Craig

Note that this is not abstract class support. The parameter is a concrete class. "All the implementation has to do" is to recognize that the parameter is PersistenceCapable, and call the jdoNewInstance () method that's enhanced into the class.

Quoting Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Hi,

I'm looking at JDO JIRA issues 241, 246, 326, 327, and 337, and I'm
assuming that these issues are being looked at by the JPOX folks.

Please correct me if there's some TCK activity needed here.

Thanks,

Craig

Craig Russell

Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/ jdo

408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature