Hi Craig, > I think we should remove Person.class and Employee.class from the list > of teardown classes in CompletenessTest. Having them there doesn't serve > any purpose since no instances of these classes are created, and they > can create issues when trying to remove instances using a different > strategy. > > For example, look at http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-285 for > other issues related to this. > > What do you think?
I agree. The changes are straightforward, I attached a patch to JDO-375. Regards Michael > > Craig > > On Apr 30, 2006, at 8:11 AM, Michael Bouschen (JIRA) wrote: > >> [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-375?page=all ] >> >> Michael Bouschen reassigned JDO-375: >> ------------------------------------ >> >> Assign To: Erik Bengtson (was: Michael Bouschen) >> >> I checked in the patch fixing getting the tearDown classes from the >> correct reader plus fixing list of tearDown classes in >> CompanyFactoryPMClass into the trunk and the 2.0 branch (see revision >> 398354). >> >> I think the remaining issue from preventing a correct cleanup after >> the test is, that the extent of a persistent interface does not >> include any instances. I'm assigning this issue back to Erik. >> >>> Company model tables are not fully cleaned up >>> --------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Key: JDO-375 >>> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-375 >>> Project: JDO >>> Type: Bug >> >>> Components: tck20 >>> Versions: JDO 2 rc1 >>> Reporter: Erik Bengtson >>> Assignee: Erik Bengtson >>> Fix For: JDO 2 final >>> Attachments: JDO-375.patch >>> >>> Tables from company model does not appear to be clean after run. >>> I can't say if this is a JPOX or TCK issue, because I did not dig >>> into the issue. [...] -- Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin
