[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-414?page=comments#action_12449821 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-414: -----------------------------------
If you skip the call to "primaryObj.addChild(secondaryObj)", you have to make primaryObj dirty in some other way, or you are not testing what the test case claims to be testing: new, clean, and dirty instance callbacks. > CallingJdoPreclear tries to add the same instance to multiple 1-M relations > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JDO-414 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-414 > Project: JDO > Issue Type: Bug > Components: tck2 > Affects Versions: JDO 2 final > Reporter: Marc Prud'hommeaux > Assigned To: Michelle Caisse > Priority: Minor > > The CallingJdoPreclear test tries to add the same instance to multiple > one-to-many relations in different instances, which may result in validation > errors at commit time. The code that does this is: > primaryObj.addChild(secondaryObj); // primaryObj contains one child; > secondaryObj contains none. primaryObj is now dirty > ... > ternaryObj.addChild(secondaryObj); > Errors can be worked around by removing secondaryObj from primaryObj.children > before adding it to ternaryObj. E.g.: > primaryObj.addChild(secondaryObj); // primaryObj contains one child; > secondaryObj contains none. primaryObj is now dirty > primaryObj.children.remove(secondaryObj); > ... > ternaryObj.addChild(secondaryObj); > Alternately, the call to "primaryObj.addChild(secondaryObj);" can probably > just be skipped ... it doesn't look like it would impact the test case. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira