Hi Craig, > And fields() has type String[ ]. Now that we have the ability to put > a name into Property and Field, should we change String[ ] fields() > default { }
When specifying an index/unique with fields (or properties) would anyone specify more than just the field names? The field itself is defined elsewhere and they only need give a reference to it. Think that was the reason I used -- Andy (Java Persistent Objects - http://www.jpox.org)