I think that this is just an issue with the declarations in the classes.
In the PI classes, the address fields were declared as I*, whereas I
think we really wanted them to be PI*. With this change, the address
fields are instances of persistent interfaces, and there should be no
problem
-- Michelle
Craig L Russell wrote:
On Jul 27, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Michelle Caisse wrote:
JPOX doesn't support embedding fields of non-persistent types even
when the field-type attribute is used to specify the specific type.
The TCK now uses inheritance from non-persistent interfaces, which
allowed us to simplify the coding of new pc classes, but doesn't
work with the embedded Address field.
This is an issue. Is JPOX able to fix this? The alternatives are not
pretty, since we use both persistent classes and persistent
interfaces in the model. The setAddress(IAddress) methods need to be
implementable by both the persistence provider and the tck code.
Any ideas?
Craig
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
