[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630851#action_12630851
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-607:
------------------------------------
I just tried to build DataNucleus with the api2 jar with this change. It won't
build
[javac]
/home/andy/work/datanucleus/platform/core/trunk/src/java/org/datanucleus/jdo/JDOPersistenceManagerFactory.java:163:
getPersistenceManagerFactory(java.util.Map,java.util.Map) in
org.datanucleus.jdo.JDOPersistenceManagerFactory cannot implement
getPersistenceManagerFactory(java.util.Map,java.util.Map) in
javax.jdo.PersistenceManagerFactory; overriding method is static
[javac] public synchronized static PersistenceManagerFactory
getPersistenceManagerFactory(Map overrides, Map props)
[javac] ^
[javac]
/home/andy/work/datanucleus/platform/core/trunk/src/java/org/datanucleus/jdo/JDOPersistenceManagerFactory.java:130:
getPersistenceManagerFactory(java.util.Map) in
org.datanucleus.jdo.JDOPersistenceManagerFactory cannot implement
getPersistenceManagerFactory(java.util.Map) in
javax.jdo.PersistenceManagerFactory; overriding method is static
[javac] public synchronized static PersistenceManagerFactory
getPersistenceManagerFactory(Map overridingProps)
[javac] ^
So the PMF interface is requiring these methods, yet JDOHelper expects static
methods with the same signatures. Hmmmmmmmmmm
> Require no-args constructor for PMF implementations and add static methods to
> PMF interface
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-607
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-607
> Project: JDO
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: api2
> Affects Versions: JDO 2 maintenance release 1
> Reporter: Craig Russell
> Assignee: Craig Russell
> Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 2
>
> Attachments: jdo-607.patch, jdo-607.patch
>
>
> In order to use Java 6 ServiceLoader to instantiate PMF, the class needs to
> implement a no-args constructor, and the PMF interface needs to define the
> methods that are currently static (and therefore not defined in the
> interface).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
