[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12652720#action_12652720
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-615:
------------------------------------
I included a top level metadata, just I called it FileMetaData, with the
comment above "Maybe FileMetaData should be called JDOMetaData?" ;-)
If you create JDOMetaData via JDOHelper then how is JDOHelper to know what the
implementation of JDOMetaData is that it should create? (Could be done via
META-INF/services entry).
No problem with using "newXXXMetaData" on MetaData classes instead of having
factory methods.
> MetaData specification API
> --------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-615
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-615
> Project: JDO
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Andy Jefferson
> Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 3
>
> Attachments: jdometadata-3.patch
>
>
> We can specify MetaData via XML or annotations. The only way missing is via
> an API. I propose mirroring the XML structure with interfaces of the form
> public interface MetaData
> {
> addExtension(String key, String value);
> removeExtension(String key, String value);
> ...
> }
> public interface FileMetaData
> {
> addPackage(PackageMetaData pmd);
> ...
> }
> public interface PackageMetaData
> {
> addClass(ClassMetaData cmd)
> ...
> }
> public interface ClassMetaData
> {
> addField(FieldMetaData fmd)
> ...
> }
> public interface FieldMetaData
> {
> setInheritance(InheritanceMetaData inhmd)
> ...
> }
> and so on.
> We would then require a method on the PMF to register the metadata.
> If there are no objections to such a feature I'll propose a patch to try to
> provide all current JDO2 capabilities.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
