Hi Andy, On Apr 18, 2009, at 2:25 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote:
3. JDO 2.3 beta? Andy has proposed we look at releasing 2.3, which means deferring a number of items that are currently tagged as 2.3. Test case coverage for the new items in 2.3 is weak. AI: everyone respond to Andy's message of 15-Apr-2009. Volunteer to write test cases so we can get this release out.My initial requirement was for "jdo2-api-2.3-beta.jar".I don't see that as meaning that the TCK needs a beta at the same time,just so that implementations have something in Maven repositories that they can build against. While the API jar is in beta we can add themissing tests; it just signifies a cut off in new features being added soimplementations can develop the new features.
Thanks for clarifying what your intent was. If we get consensus that this is what we want to do it's possible.
Other opinions? Craig
--Andy
Craig L Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[email protected] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
