Hi Craig, > > Ahh but they weren't in the release. They were in SVN. The "release" > > distribution doesn't have them. > > I don't follow. The files were checked into the releases/2.3-ea > directory in svn. Was checking them in part of the release process?
No, but then the instructions for release aren't simple. They were under "db/jdo/**branches** not **releases**, so my previous reply was simply to verify if the license of aforementioned jars prohibits existence in SVN; they aren't being distributed. Either way they aren't there now. > > Wish you people would sort your licenses out, then > > none of this would be a problem ;-) > > Who is "you people"? Sun, who don't release these jars under a license > that Apache finds suitable? Just my vain attempt at humour. There was a smiley. I'll stick to serious stuff from now on :-) -- Andy (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
