I can commit. Out of twin for weekend though. Will do next week. Sent from mobile device. Responses brief.
On Dec 9, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Craig L Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > Go ahead and commit or if you don't have commit access (I forget) then open a > JIRA and attach a patch for one of us to commit. > > Craig > > On Dec 9, 2010, at 6:33 AM, Matthew Adams wrote: > >> Maven's test scope only means that it needs to be on the test classpath. It >> would not introduce a runtime or even compile time dependency of >> jdo-api.jar. Optional means that if Maven can't find it, compilation should >> still succeed, which it wouldn't if it weren't available. Again, <scope> >> and <optional> are orthogonal concerns. >> >> -Matthew >> >> Sent from mobile device. Responses brief. >> >> On Dec 9, 2010, at 1:24 AM, Andy Jefferson <a...@datanucleus.org> wrote: >> >>>> You do not want to mark it as not optional since IIRC that would mean that >>>> anything building against jdo-api.jar would have to have ant in the >>>> CLASSPATH. We do not want that. >>> >>> Although maybe the "test" scope would override that requirement? >>> >>> No subsititute for actually trying it with a clean M2 repo, and >>> building/running a simple JDO project against it (with clean M2 repo also). >>> >>> -- >>> Andy >>> DataNucleus (http://www.datanucleus.org) > > Craig L Russell > Architect, Oracle > http://db.apache.org/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! >
