On 3/9/2012 11:18 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Attendees: Michelle Caisse, Michael Bouschen, Craig Russell

 Agenda:

 1. README.html under trunk needs to be reviewed.

AI Everyone please READ ME.

2. log4j class loader, no enhancer log output with maven 2: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-706? AI Michelle try some more experiments with the iut and jdori profiles. Specifying -P iut on command line should work, disable the jdori profile. Exectck should be able to ask maven which profile(s) are active.

This page seems to indicate that there is no programmatic way of determining which profile is active. It suggests using an environment variable, as I've done in exectck. http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/get-active-profile-in-pom-td108838.html

This page documents that an activeByDefault profile will deactivate when another profile is activated /by any available means. /http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-profiles.html:

   Profiles can also be active by default using a configuration like
   the following:

   <profiles>
      <profile>
        <id>profile-1</id>
        <activation>
          <activeByDefault>true</activeByDefault>
        </activation>
        ...
      </profile>
   </profiles>

   This profile will automatically be active for all builds/unless
   another profile in the same POM is activated using one of the
   previously described methods. All profiles that are active by
   default are automatically deactivated when a profile in the POM is
   activated on the command line or through its activation config./ [My
   italics.]

Thus my setup in exectck pom.xml should work fine.

-- Michelle



3. Refactor JDO parent & child poms https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-707

It's not obvious why a parent pom at the same level as others is better than the current pom in the trunk directory.

4. Create JIRA "component" entry for exectck & parent-pom modules https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-708

It's not obvious that exectck and tck are different components even thought they are physically different.

 5. Issue with setting autoCreateTables=false

The sequence support for Derby is now included in DataNucleus. But it doesn't seem to work. Change the mapping in the orm file to include the schema name. But is this the only way for DN to find the sequence? Maybe need to add schema to the package entry in the orm.

6. What's needed to release 3.1? Go to https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10630, click "Issues" in the menu on the left and then click "JDO 3 maintenacnce release 1 (3.1)" under "Unresolved: By Version"

Still waiting for log4j class loader, sequences, and specification updates.

 7. Other issues

 Action Items from weeks past:

[April 8 2011] AI Craig comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-617 re the utility of the update operator. [Sep 23 2011] AI Michael document when changing dependencies (to DataNucleus) it's necessary to rebuild the exectck project before running tck.
Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!



Reply via email to