[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14057845#comment-14057845
]
Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-730:
--------------------------------------
JDOQL supports this kind of queries using a feature called unconstrained
variables (see chapter 14.6.5 in the specification).
Class1 is the class mapped to Table1 and Class2 is mapped to Table2. The query
uses Class1 as the candidate class of the query and declares a variable b of
type Class2. The variable b is not bound by a contains clause, so ths is called
an unconstrained variable.
Query q = pm.newQuery(Class1.class);
q.setFilter("this.z == b.w");
q.setResult("this.x, b.y")
q.declareVariables("com.xyz.Class2 b");
Collection result = (Collection )q.execute();
Here is the single-string version of the query:
select this.x, b.y from com.xyz.Class1 where this.z == b.w variables
com.xyz.Class2 b
Hope this helps.
> Creating the innerjoin without relationship between objects
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-730
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-730
> Project: JDO
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: api
> Affects Versions: JDO 3.1-rc1
> Reporter: RaviRaja
> Assignee: Michael Bouschen
> Fix For: JDO 3.1
>
>
> Cannot make innerjoin like this without relationship:
> select a.x, b.y from Table1 as a INNER JOIN Table 2 as b ON a.z=b.w
> Note: a.z and b.w are not primary and foreign keys
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
