[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17515741#comment-17515741
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-809:
------------------------------------
See GitHub pull request #42
> Mapping info for ArrayListCollections/TreeSetCollections doesn't correctly
> map embedded element fields
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-809
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-809
> Project: JDO
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: tck
> Affects Versions: JDO 2 final (2.0), JDO 3 (3.0), JDO 3.1, JDO 3.2
> Reporter: Andy Jefferson
> Priority: Major
>
> The tests for the different java.util.Collection types all should follow the
> same pattern, with the samples having a range of fields that cover the
> primary field usages.
> Field XXXOfObject1 should represent a Collection of Object, where the Object
> is a PersistenceCapable type, persisting embedded into a join table.
> Field XXXOfSimpleClass should represent a Collection of PersistenceCapable
> type, persisting embedded into a join table.
> Field XXXOfSimpleInterface should represent a Collection of interface, where
> the interface is a PersistenceCapable type, persisting embedded into a join
> table.
>
> In the case of the ArrayList and TreeSet cases the ORM files do not define
> the <embedded> block for how the fields of the PersistenceCapable element
> will map into the join table. The schema for those cases also do not map the
> fields of the PersistenceCapable element, instead just having a FK to the
> table of the element (so not embedded at all).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
