Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Tilmann Zäschke, Tobias Bouschen, Craig Russell

Next meeting: Tuesday November 5 1100 PST 2000 CET

Agenda:

1. JIRA JDO-843 "JDOQLTypedQuery: issue with candidate("this") method" 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-843
Merged and resolved

2. JIRA JDO-842 "Q class specification of candidate() method" 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-842

Branches have been created in db-jdo for the api changes and in 
jdo-specification for the Chapter 14 changes:

https://github.com/apache/db-jdo/blob/JDO-842/api/src/main/java/javax/jdo/JDOQLTypedQuery.java
https://github.com/clr-apache/jdo-specification/tree/JDO-842

AI Craig specification needs correction on many Employee typos
done. new version is in github repository.
git commit -m "Fix Qemployee and Qdepartment"

We need to look at the JDOQLTypedQuery variable method taking String and Class 
parameters. These are never used either in the examples in the specification or 
in the TCK tests.
Volunteer needed.

The specification repository has incorrect notification settings. 
Apparently I cannot give anyone else admin authority to a private repository.
https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/108527

I will need help configuring notifications so the JDO community can see what is 
happening...

3. JIRA JDO-812 "Move to JDK 11 as the lowest supported version" 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-812
Comment from Andy about DN 6 versions passing the TCK.

AI Michael verify TCK with latest DN versions.

4. sonarcloud issues

 * JIRA JDO-819 "Code quality analysis"
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-819
 * JIRA JDO-823 "Fix sonarcloud issues of type Code Smells"
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-823
 * Sonarcloud link: https://sonarcloud.io/summary/overall?id=db-jdo
 * Cognitive Complexity of methods should not be too high:
https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?resolved=false&rules=java%3AS3776&severities=CRITICAL&types=CODE_SMELL&id=db-jdo
 
 * Raw types should not be used:
https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?resolved=false&rules=java%3AS3740&severities=MAJOR&id=db-jdo
 

5. Other issues

Action Items from weeks past:

[Sep 10 2024] AI Craig: write up proposed changes in a new branch and send for 
review.
[Sep 03 2024] AI Craig: create a new branch in specification to track spec 
changes
[Aug 27 2024] AI JDO-842: propose PR for specification (query chapter) and API 
(javadoc) and TCK (query tests). Use branches JDO-842 for this work. The 
specification has its own repository.
[Jan 02 2024] AI everyone: see if anyone can see a problem with the parallel 
execution of tests Cast.java and SupportedOptionalMethods.java
[Jul 13 2023] AI All Open a new JIRA for Android since having JNDI in the API 
disallows use with Android
[Jun 08 2023] AI All make a JIRA: JDO support for Java Records 
https://openjdk.org/jeps/395
[Dec 09 2021] AI Craig: Try to contact all current/former participants in JDO 
development and see if and how they want to be recognized on the JDO and DB web 
sites.https://db.apache.org/whoweare.html
[Oct 07 2021] AI Craig send a private message to all JSR-243 Expert Group 
members asking if they wish to continue.
[Mar 25 2021] AI Craig: investigate "merging" papajdo and apache.clr accounts
[Oct 17 2014] AI Matthew any updates for "Modify specification to address NoSQL 
datastores "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-651


Craig L Russell
c...@apache.org

Reply via email to