This patch is done, please review.
-Halton. On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 07:12 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > > Halton Huo wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 00:20 +1200, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: > >> Halton, > >> > >> Again, a better fix would be to check if Xephyr or Xnest is available > >> in configure. It should be an upstreamable change. > > Laca, > > > > Xephyr/Xnest is not needed during building time. It need to be in $PATH > > during run-time. Xephyr is recommenced replacement for Xnest, I'm trying > > to persuade maintainer to accept this idea. > > Then couldn't you at run time try execing Xephyr first, and if that fails, > try execing Xnest instead? Xephyr is much newer than Xnest, and not found > on many older systems. (We only have it in S10U4 and later for instance.) > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: tsclient-02-xnest-xephyr.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 2718 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/jds-review/attachments/20080710/9ae2cfff/attachment.bin>
