Brian:
Please see my comments below

Chris

Brian Cameron ??:
> Chris:
>
>   
>> These four libs are delivered with SUNWgtkmm, they are missing manpage
>> originally. Attached are the manpage for them.
>>     
>
> We have a separate manpage for libgiomm, but we lump all the
> other "mm" interfaces into a single manpage.  This seems a bit
> odd.  Shouldn't we either have separate manpages for them all
> or a single manpage with shadow manpages?
>
>   
These four libs are delivered in SUNWgtkmm package (pangomm will be
moved out), and all
belong to gtkmm project.
> The NAME says: C++ interface for GTK+
> However, this manpage seems to be intended to be a shadow manpage
> for libatkmm, libgdkmm, etc. also?  So just saying "for GTK+"
> doesn't seem right.
>   
What I mean GTK+ here is the GTK+ project, I think they all listed under
gtk.org. I can make it
clear if needed.
> The DESCRIPTION section only explains gtkmm, and not the other
> libraries that you plan to shadow manpage to this one.
>   
gtkmm is a name of the project, it includes these four libs, just like
the manpage for libpango, it
inclues libpango, libpangox etc. but in the Description, we only use the
statement Pango.
> You list libpango-1.4 manpage in the DESCRIPTION but you
> list "libpangomm-1.4" in the FILES section.  This seems an
> error.
>   
This is a slip, I'll correct
> The "SEE ALSO" section should probably refer to the libatk-1.0,
> libgdk_pixbuf-2.0, libgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0 manpages if the
> pixbuf interfaces are also in these libraries?  Are they?
>
> Would be good to reference the libgiomm-2.4.3 and libglibmm-2.4.3
> manpages in the "SEE ALSO" section, I think.
>
>   
Good point.
> The manpages referenced should also be updated to reference their
> corresponding "mm" manpage, so libatk-1.0 should refer to the
> libatkmm-1.6 manpage.
>
>   
Good point
> There seems to be a /usr/share/doc/gtkmm-2.4 directory, but this
> doesn't seem referenced in the FILE section as a documentation
> reference.  Why don't the other interfaces have docs installed
> to /usr/share/doc?  Even if we don't install docs, we probably
> should provide online doc links for each interface.
>   

/usr/share/doc/gtkmm-2.4 directory contains the demo sourcecode in 
/usr/demo/jds/bin/gtkmm, I will add
it to the FILE section

> I notice a /usr/share/doc/cairomm directory.  Should we also
> have a manpage for this?
>
>   
cairomm is onwed by Ghee, I think he will provide the manpage.
> Brian
>   


Reply via email to