Okay, understood.
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 12:14 +0800, brian.lu wrote:
> Because:
> 1. Firefox depends on autoconf 2.13 to generate all configure files, the
> one shipped with CBE is 2.60
> 2. After the patch has been upstreamed ( I'm pushing it to the
> community), there is no need to run autoconf anymore
> because configure file will be updated in the community code base.
>
> Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 12:36 +0800, brian.lu wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I've discussed this with Dave. He thinks that it's more convenient to
> >> patch configure. I've posted a patch in the community which patches
> >> configure.in.
> >>
> >
> > How so? Why is it more convenient to have a longish patch of a
> > generated file than adding a single line to the source (configure.in)
> > and running autoconf?
> >
> > Laca
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
