Ghee/Laca: Okay, I backed out the offending patch. I think I have a better understanding of what's going on here - and I think the bug is actually with the documentation at docs.sun.com. You can read the details in bugs 6525411 and 6228488 if you want more details.
Brian >> Hi Brian, >> >> On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 16:30 +0800, Brian Cameron wrote: >> >>> + >>> +# If running on Solaris, run sessionexit script. >>> +# >>> +if [ -x "/etc/dt/config/sessionexit" ]; then >>> + /etc/dt/config/sessionexit >>> +fi >>> +if [ -x "/usr/dt/config/sessionexit" ]; then >>> + /usr/dt/config/sessionexit >>> +fi >>> + >>> exit 0 >>> >> >> Is this the usual way of using this? >> All the /usr/dt/config files I know are ignored if there is a >> /etc/dt/config version. Basically, you can copy the /usr/dt/config >> file to /etc/dt/config and modify it if you want to do something >> different from the default. >> > In others words, /etc/dt should be run if it is there, but not both. > Another thing, I couldn't find where /usr/dt/config/sessionexit > [sessionetc] > are being specified as a public interface (I thought it was either > dtlogin/dtsession). > If gdm is going to inherit support s interface, it should be documented > and I wonder > what is the consequence of adopting of > /usr/dt > /etc/dt > prfixes impacts our EOL of CDE? > > > -Ghee >> Laca >> >> >
