Here's the newest patch 

--irene
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 15:36 +0800, Irene (Shi Ying) Huang wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 08:08 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> > Irene (Shi Ying) Huang wrote:
> >  > +               aspell = fopen (dic, "r");
> >  > +                perspell = fopen (filename, "a");
> >  > +                if (g_file_test (filename, G_FILE_TEST_EXISTS))
> >  > +                        perspell = fopen (filename, "a");
> >  > +                else {
> >  > +                        directory = g_build_filename (home_dir, 
> > ENCHANT_USER_PATH_EXTENSION, NULL);
> >  > +                        if (!g_file_test (directory, 
> > G_FILE_TEST_EXISTS) || !g_file_test 
> > (directory, G_FILE_TEST_IS_DIR))
> >  > +                                g_mkdir (directory , 0700);
> >  > +                        perspell = fopen (filename, "w");
> >  > +                }
> > 
> > Looks like a memory/file descriptor leak, since the fopen() from the
> > second line is just lost when you redo it in the if/else clauses.
> Sorry that was a mistake
> > 
> > Also, since you only close aspell & perspell if both are opened, do
> > you leak in cases where one fails but the other succeeded?
> > 
> > > +                 if (fgets (line, sizeof (line), aspell)) {
> > > +                         while (fgets (line, sizeof (line), aspell))
> > > +                                 fputs (line, perspell);
> > 
> > Are you intentionally throwing away the first line from the aspell
> > file?   If not, why not just dump the if line altogether?   If so,
> > it would be good to include a comment as to why, so future programmers
> > looking at it don't wonder why.
> yes I intentionally throw the first line away, because of different
> dictionary format between aspell and hunspell. :) 
> The new patch is attached :) please review
> 
> --irene
> > 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: enchant-03-personaldic.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2682 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/jds-review/attachments/20070420/a61b1631/attachment.bin>

Reply via email to