Hi all,
Does anyone know why we should copy class action scripts into
ext-sources? Is JDS consolidation allowed to do like this? To me, it
seems a *pkgbuild* bug. If no other reasons, pkgbuild should directly
consume the system default class action scripts
/usr/sadm/install/scripts/* rather than copy them to ext-sources, right?
lin
Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
> Hi Darren, looks good. Yes, ext-sources is the right place for exec_attr
> and the class action scripts. Just 2 nits:
>
> On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 22:12 +0000, Darren Kenny wrote:
>
>> mkdir %name-%version
>> %systemtoolsbackends.prep -d %name-%version
>> %gnomesystemtools.prep -d %name-%version
>> +cp %SOURCE1 %{_builddir}/%name-%version/exec_attr
>>
>
> You don't actually need to do this (although it doesn't hurt), you
> could just refer to %SOURCE1 in %install.
>
>
>> cd %{_builddir}/%name-%version
>> gzcat %SOURCE0 | tar xf -
>>
>> @@ -85,6 +87,8 @@
>> rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
>> %systemtoolsbackends.install -d %name-%version
>> %gnomesystemtools.install -d %name-%version
>> +mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/security
>> +cp %{_builddir}/%name-%version/exec_attr
>> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/security
>>
>
> It's usually better to use "install" for this, so that you can specify
> the permissions.
>
> Thanks,
> Laca
>
>
>> mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/inet/gnome-system-tools
>> #Manpages
>> rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}
>>
>
>
--
x82120 / +86 10 82618200
