[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-9?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12974208#action_12974208
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-9:
----------------------------------
>> Review package names (currently c.h.h.j.sparql.larq and c.h.h.j.query.larq).
>> Should we move to c.h.h.j.larq.*?
> I think we should, but I have not done it yet.
> Indeed, we could change to org.apache.jena.larq.*. What do you think?
OK - for LARQ, because it's new. The renaming existing APIs in Jena and ARQ
needs to be co-ordinated and we need to discuss the migration strategy. There
is no rush to do it - not until we have the codebase cleared for all legal
issues.
> LARQ as a separate module from ARQ
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-9
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-9
> Project: Jena
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: LARQ
> Reporter: Paolo Castagna
> Assignee: Paolo Castagna
>
> LARQ can be extracted from ARQ as a separate module depending on ARQ.
> ARQ should not depend on LARQ (to avoid dependency cycles) and it could check
> if LARQ is available in the classpath and wire the property function in
> dynamically.
> LARQ can have a different release cycle from ARQ and people who do not need
> free text search will not need to include Lucene in their classpath.
> A separate (experimental) module is available here:
> https://jena.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/jena/LARQ/trunk/
> List of things to do/decide includes:
> - Merge JENA-5 fix
> - Upgrade Lucene version to 2.9.3 and fix tests (if there are failures).
> - Remove code using deprecated Lucene APIs and upgrade to Lucene 3.0.x.
> - Decide how many results to return when the user does not specify it, 1000?
> More?
> - Should we use the index to suppress duplicates instead of in-memory data
> structures?
> - How do we implement removals/unindex?
> - We could use the Model to decide when there are no more triples with a
> specified literal and therefore it's ok to remove it from Lucene.
> - See how the new NRT capabilities of Lucene can be used from LARQ.
> - Review package names (currently c.h.h.j.sparql.larq and
> c.h.h.j.query.larq). Should we move to c.h.h.j.larq.*?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
