Could you explain the testing issue? The queries are quite long and
while it may be obvious to you, it isn't to me!
Andy
On 03/02/11 22:44, Benson Margulies wrote:
Sure. Sorry to transgress. In this case, since the very same query
(structurally) had very different performance characteristics
depending on which string was used to match a literal, I jumped to a
conclusion. In particular, I'm assuming that the nature of OPTIONAL is
that the 'required' part constrains the second part, I didn't think
that I was inventing something like that.
