[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-62?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030066#comment-13030066
]
Paolo Castagna commented on JENA-62:
------------------------------------
This is not a blocker for JENA-63. We can live with LARQ (old/legacy in ARQ)
and use the new LARQ (the separate module) in the new apps (for example,
Fuseki).
At one point, removing LARQ from ARQ is a matter of keep things clean.
> Remove LARQ from ARQ
> --------------------
>
> Key: JENA-62
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-62
> Project: Jena
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: ARQ, LARQ
> Reporter: Paolo Castagna
> Assignee: Paolo Castagna
>
> LARQ (as well as the Lucene dependency) needs to be removed from ARQ.
> ARQ will use the separate LARQ module.
> Since LARQ depends on Lucene and ARQ and we cannot have cycles in our
> dependency graph, ARQ cannot depend on LARQ.
> LARQ is a sort of plug-in for ARQ and we could load it and wire it in into
> ARQ if present in the classpath, in a similar way as showed here:
> http://markmail.org/thread/r5phyiuqkqsyi2xc
> Should we change the namespace for the property function?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
